Parliament Passed Key Controversial Judicial Reform Measure

Israeli parliament passes controversial major judicial reform measure

Israel’s parliament recently approved a key judicial reform measure that has sparked controversy within the country. This decision has important implications for Israel’s justice system and raises concerns about its impact on judicial independence.

The adopted measure aims to change the rules for appointing judges to the Supreme Court of Israel. According to the reform, the power of appointment will now be held by a committee made up of members of the Israeli parliament, government and judiciary. This measure replaces the old system in which the power of appointment was mainly in the hands of the president of the Supreme Court.

Proponents of the reform argue that it strengthens democracy by giving a greater voice to the elected representatives of the Israeli people. They argue that appointing power should be democratically distributed and that Parliament’s role in this process is crucial to reflect public preferences.

However, critics of this reform strongly criticize this measure, arguing that it compromises judicial independence by politicizing appointments. They point out that this could lead to partisan appointments and influence the integrity of Israel’s judicial system. Moreover, they argue that these changes are contrary to international standards for judicial independence.

This reform has also raised concerns about its impact on the rule of law and constitutional guarantees in Israel. Some fear this will weaken the separation of powers and open the door to political pressure on judges. Opponents fear that this will have negative consequences on the population’s confidence in the judicial system.

In response to criticism, proponents of the reform say it aims to strengthen judges’ accountability to the Israeli people. They argue that this change will make judicial decisions more transparent and better aligned with societal values. However, these arguments are disputed by those who believe that judicial independence is essential to ensuring a fair and impartial judicial system.

This key step in judicial reform in Israel continues to generate intense and polarized debate in society. The extent of its impact on the justice system and judicial independence remains to be determined, but it is clear that this reform has far-reaching implications for Israel as a democratic state.

→ READ ALSO: Overtourism: these alternatives that are emerging everywhere in France to try to remedy it

→ READ ALSO: Cameroon: The collapse of a building kills a dozen

→ READ ALSO: July 24, 1993, the ECOWAS Treaty is revised by the Member States

👉 Click here to join news group on Whatsapp